Level 3
Explanation/analysis/argument (12-15 marks)
• Shows proficient understanding of the task
• Proficient understanding of the way that technical aspects are used to
construct the extract’s representations
• Mostly relevant to set question
Use of examples (12-15 marks)
• Offers consistent textual evidence from the extract
• Offers a range of examples (at least three technical areas covered)
• Offers examples which are mostly relevant to the set question
Use of terminology (6-7 marks)
• Use of terminology is mostly accurate
Straightforward ideas have been expressed with some clarity and fluency.
Arguments are generally relevant, though may stray from the point of the
question. There will be some errors of spelling, punctuation and grammar,
but these are unlikely to be intrusive or obscure meaning.
Level 4
Explanation/analysis/argument (16-20 marks)
• Shows excellent understanding of the task
• Excellent knowledge and understanding of the way that technical
aspects are used to construct the extract’s representations
• Clearly relevant to set question
Use of examples (16-20 marks)
• Offers frequent textual analysis from the extract – award marks to
reflect the range and appropriateness of examples
• Offers a full range of examples from each technical area
• Offers examples which are clearly relevant to the set question
Use of terminology (8-10 marks)
• Use of terminology is relevant and accurate
Complex issues have been expressed clearly and fluently. Sentences and
paragraphs, consistently relevant, have been well structured, using
appropriate technical terminology. There may be few, if any, errors of
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.